Ideology Mangupa Horja Godang Oral Tradition of Indigenous Angkola Community

Yusni Khairul Amri

Abstract


Horja Godang tradition in the context of ideology is as a system of public trust that must be accomplished for a pride although there are times the couple have to sell an existing property to support it. So this Mangupa Horja Godang tradition tend to serve as a prestige to set an image for the haves in the community. When couples do not perform this traditional ceremonies they are considered to have a traditional debt that must be paid when they have the means. The analysis results of performance data of Mangupa Horja Godang found the local knowledge values such as: a) the human relationship with God, b) the meaning of human life, c) the human relationship with the natural surroundings, d) the human relationship with time, e) the behavior to be industrious and enterprising, thrifty, and religious, to get along peacefully with each other; f) the aesthetic value of humility, customary of politeness, g) the expectation that the marriage will be the marriage of a lifetime; h) The value and Ideological significance of indigenous material derived pangupa animals, plants, and derived from nature.


Keywords


Tradition Mangupa, Antropolinguistik, Ideology

Full Text:

PDF

References


Badan Pusat Statistik. Padangsidimpuan dalam Angka (2010). Padangsidimpuan In Figures 2010.

Bahril, Hidayat. (2004). Tema-tema Psikologis dalam tradisi Mangupa Horja Godang pada pasangan pernikahan pemula dalam masyarakat perantau Tapanuli Selatan di Pekanbaru. Yogyakarta: Program Studi Psikologi FPSB UII.

Bascom, W.R, (1973). Folklore, Verbal Art, and Culture. The Journal of American Folklore, Vol. 86, No. 342 (Oct.-Dec., 1973), pp. 374-381.

Barthes, Roland. (1957). Mythologies. Paris: Editions du Seuil.

_____________.1966. Introduction a IAnaliyse Structural des Recit dalam Communications No.8. Paris: Seuil.

_____________. 2000. (1967). Elements of Semiology. Terjemahan dari Bahasa Prancis oleh A Lavers dan C. Smith. Karangan asli terbit dalam Bahasa Prancis Tahun 1964. Paris: Seuil.

Berg, Bruce L. 1989, Qualitative Research Methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Bolinger, Dwight. 1975. Aspects of Language. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.

Christovmy, T. 2004. Semiotika Budaya. Depok UI: Pusat Penelitian dan Kemasyarakatan dan Budaya Direktorat Riset dan Pengabdian Masyarakat.

de Vito, J. A. 1970. The Psychology of Speech and Language: An Introduction to Psycholinguistics. New York: Random House.

Danandjaja. J. 2002. Folklor Indonesia: Ilmu Gosip, Dongeng dan lain-lain. Cetakan ke-VI. Jakarta: Pustaka Utama Grafiti.

Danesi, M. dan P. Perron 1999. Analyzing Cultures. Bloomington/ Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

De Saussure, Ferdinand. 1969. Cours de Linguistique Generale. Paris: Payot.

Duranti, A. 2001. Linguistic Anthropology: A Reader. Massachussets: Blackwell Publishers.

Duranti, Alessandro (ed). 2001. Linguistic Anthropology. Massachusetts: Blackwell.

Duranti Alessandro. 1997. Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Eco. Umberto 1979. A Theory of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Foley, William A. 1997. Anthropological Linguistics: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.

Foley, John Miles. (Ed) 1986. Oral Tradition in Literature: Interpretation in Context. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.

_______________. 1988. The Theory of Oral Composition: History and Methododology. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

Finnegan, Ruth. 1992. Oral Traditions and The Verbal Arts: A Guide to Research Practices. New York: Routledge.

Gultom, Djaluat Rajamarpodang, 1995. Dalihan Na Tolu dan Prinsip Dasar Nilai Budaya Batak. Medan: Armanda

Harahap, Baginda Raja, Tanpa Tahun, Poda-podda Ni Adat Horja Godang/ Bolon/ Siluluton/ Siriaon.

Hasil Musyawarah Lembaga Adat dan Budaya.24-26 Oktober 1996, Adat Budaya Angkola-Sipirok-Haruaya Mardomu Bulung Napa-napa Ni Sibualbuali.

Hoed. Benny H. 2008. Semiotik dan Dinamika Sosial Budaya. Depok: Fakultas Ilmu Pengetahuan Budaya Univesitas Indonesia.

Kluckhohn, C dan Strodttbeck. 1961. Variation in Values Orientation. Englewood Clifft. NJ.:Prentice-Hall.

Koentjaraningrat, 1985. Ritus Peralihan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Levi-Strauss, Claude. 1972. Structural Anthropollogy. Great Britain:Penguin Books.

Nasution H. Pandapotan, 2005. Adat Budaya Mandailing: dalam Tantangan Zaman. Medan: Forkala.

Nort, W. (1990). 1995. Handbook of Semiotics. Bloomington/ Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

Olrik, Axel. 1992. Principles for Traditions Narrative Research. Blomington: Indiana University Press.

Ong, Walter J. 2007. Orality and Lteracy. New York: Methuen and Co. Ld.

Parsadaan Marga Harahap Dohot Boruna, 1993. Horja: adat-istiadat Dalihan Na Tolu, musyawarah adat Persadaan Marga Harahap Dohot Anak Boruna di Padang Sidempuan 26-27 Desember 1991, Mangupa Horja Godang:Grafiti.

Pudentia. 2003. Antologi Prosa Rakyat Melayu Indonesia. Jakarta: Pusat Bahasa.

Ritonga, Parlaungan dan Ridwan Azhar, 2002, Sistem Pertuturan Masyarakat Tapanuli Selatan, Medan: Yandira Agung.

Sibarani, Robert, 2012, Antropolinguistik: Antropologi Linguistik-Linguistik Antropologi, Medan: Penerbit Poda.

Smith, W. Robertson. 1886-1894. Lecture on Religion of the Smites dalam Kuntjaraningrat. 1987. Sejarah teori Antropologi. Jilid I. Jakarta:UI Press.

Spradley, James P. 1980. Doing Participants Observation. Participants Observation. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.

Sudaryanto, 1993. Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa: Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan secara Linguistis. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana.

Rahyono, F.X. 2009. Kearifan Budaya dalam Kata. Jakarta: Wedatama Widyasastra.

Van Zoest. Aart.1993. Semiotika: Tentang Tanda dan Cara Kerjanya, dan Apa yang Kita Lakukan Dengannya. Jakarta: Yayasan Sumber Agung.

Van Dijk, TA. 1977. Text and Context: Explorations in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse. Longmans Linguistics Library. Longman, London.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.